Following on from the JM colberg post on the current state of photojournalism. Here’s an account of the judging process at the World Press Photo Awards By Adam Broomberg and Oliver Chanarin. It makes for very interesting reading.
As i mentioned before I am personally more interested in the ‘lateral’ approach to photojournalism. Maybe the quote below has something to do with the current state of photojournalism that jorg refers to. With a ‘literal’ image being more likely to get through the award screening process rather than something more lateral that needs the benefit of context.
At this stage caption information is not available; each image must be judged on aesthetic grounds, outside of the context for which it was created, severed from words of explanation. This is simply practical; the sheer volume of images precludes more intense scrutiny. But without names, dates, locations, or interviews with the photographers the decision making process regresses into using only formal considerations; composition, lighting and focus. At times this feels obscene. We are asked to judge whether for example a photograph of a child suffocating to death in a mudslide is sufficiently beautiful to win a prize. On this occasion it seems not.
dont worry.i cant even understand what i am trying to articulate here. can someone help. maybe the excerpt, link approach is the best idea for my blog
KISS.